Large-Scale Baler Wrapper VS Small-Scale: Which One Suits Your Farm Better?

4.7/5 - (80 صوت)

Choosing the right silage baler wrapper has a direct impact on your farm’s productivity and costs. This article compares the high-output TZ-70-70 model with the compact 55-52 model to help you determine which is better suited to the size of your operation.

محتويات يخفي

1 Capacity & Efficiency

2 Power source for bale wrappers

3 Bale size & Storage efficiency

4 Wrapping technology: automation advantage

5 Machine cost efficiency

6 Conclusion: which one fits you best?

Capacity & Efficiency

The TZ-70-70 is double film wrapped and can bale up to 80 bales per hour, five times more efficient than manual labor. Ideal for large farms and silage processing plants, it ensures high bale densities (750 kg/m3) and stable fermentation for long term storage.

The TZ-55-52 baler wrapper is suitable for smaller farms that bale fewer bales per hour, supporting semi-automated operation while still delivering good performance.

Power source for bale wrappers

The TZ-70-70 utilizes an all-electric system equipped with intelligent overload protection for continuous and reliable all-weather operation.

The TZ-55-52 offers a choice of electric or diesel power, providing flexibility for farms that lack a stable power supply.

Bale size & Storage efficiency

The TZ-70-70 produces larger bales (70 x 70 cm diameter, 150-200 kg per bale), reducing handling frequency and maximizing storage efficiency, making it ideal for export and large-scale feed preservation.

In contrast, the TZ-55-52 produces bales with a diameter of 50 x 52 cm, which are lighter in weight and easier to manage manually, making them ideal for small herds.

Wrapping technology: automation advantage

The TZ-70-70 offers automated film cutting, layering (adjustable from 2-6 layers), and netting and string bundling with an anaerobic sealing rate of 99%, making it ideal for 2-3 years of open storage.

The TZ-55-52 allows for more manual intervention and the use of netting or haystacks for greater flexibility but less automation.

Machine cost efficiency

Although the TZ-70-70 silage baler wrapper has a higher upfront cost, it can reduce the cost per ton of feed by up to 30% and increase annual farm income by more than 25%.

The TZ-55-52 has a lower investment and is more cost-effective for small-scale users or farms just starting silage farming.

Conclusion: which one fits you best?

Choose the TZ-70-70 if you run a larger operation, value full automation, and are looking for long-term efficiency and feed quality. (وظيفة ذات صلة: TZ-70-70 Silage التغليف آلة القش بالير للبيع>>)

If you have a smaller operation, need power flexibility, and prefer an affordable solution, choose the TZ-55-52. (اقرأ المزيد: آلة مكبس سيلاج الذرة الأوتوماتيكية لحفظ الأعلاف>>)